[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110829144843.c8e9d397.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:48:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: sjayaraman@...e.de
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: document blk-plug
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:58:21 +0530
Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de> wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -863,17 +863,23 @@ struct request_queue *blk_alloc_queue_node(gfp_t, int);
> extern void blk_put_queue(struct request_queue *);
>
> /*
> + * blk_plug allows to build up a queue of related requests by holding the I/O
> + * fragments for a short period. This allows merging of sequential requests
> + * into single larger request. As the requests are moved from per-task list to
> + * the device's request_queue in a batch, this results in improved
> + * scalability as the lock contention for request_queue lock is reduced.
> + *
> * Note: Code in between changing the blk_plug list/cb_list or element of such
> * lists is preemptable, but such code can't do sleep (or be very careful),
> * otherwise data is corrupted. For details, please check schedule() where
> * blk_schedule_flush_plug() is called.
What does the older part of this comment mean? If a code section is
preemptible then it *will* sleep. That's what preemption does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists