linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 19/24] sunrpc: Remove unnecessary OOM logging messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110829.180348.1774953636752413432.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bharrosh@...asas.com
Cc:	Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, joe@...ches.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
	neilb@...e.de, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/24] sunrpc: Remove unnecessary OOM logging messages

From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:54:59 -0700

> I have a question about that. Are the dprints going to show the stack backtrace?

Yes, OOMs give full stack backtraces.

> If yes above? then I'm not sure I like it either, because am I'll be getting a full
> stack backtrace for every failed allocation?

They've been doing this for years, so obviously they haven't bothered you
enough to care up to this point.

All of this pushback is pure uneducated noise, please stop blocking progress
with poorly informed objections.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/