[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110829221132.GB26846@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:11:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org,
Jerome Oufella <jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 2/4] platform: (TS-5500) add GPIO support
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 07:40:25PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> arch/x86/platform/ts5500/ts5500_gpio.c | 421 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/platform/ts5500/ts5500_gpio.h | 60 +++++
New GPIO drivers should really go under drivers/gpiolib and be called
gpio-foo.c.
> +static int ts5500_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> +{
> + struct ts5500_drvdata *drvdata;
> +
> + drvdata = container_of(chip, struct ts5500_drvdata, gpio_chip);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drvdata->gpio_lock);
> + if (requested_gpios[offset]) {
> + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->gpio_lock);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + requested_gpios[offset] = 1;
> + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->gpio_lock);
gpiolib should already be making sure there's only one user at once, no
need to bother open coding it in the driver.
> + bitno = line_to_bit_map[offset];
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drvdata->gpio_lock);
> + byte = inb(ioaddr);
> + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->gpio_lock);
Do you really need the lock to do a read?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists