[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110830091150.176cd08c@notabene.brown>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:11:50 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] All Arch: remove linkage for sys_nfsservctl system call
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:57:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:03:11 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> >
> > The nfsservctl system call is now gone, so we should remove all
> > linkage for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I don't normally have to deal with this kind of cross-architecture
> > patch; is this the right etiquette for it?
>
> It turns out (with hindsight) that my reaction to this patch should have
> been:
>
> If you haven't built this on all architectures (an noone expects you to
> actually do that), then it should spend a day or two in linux-next before
> being sent to Linus.
>
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your help in sorting this out. I have no idea how I missed those
few nfsservctl references but I clearly did and you and -next have proved
valuable yet again.
And really *everything* should spend a few days in linux-next before going
to Linus. We all know that but it sometimes seem hard to *do* that ....
until we have learnt the hard way a couple of times :-(
Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists