[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110829080711.GC32114@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:07:11 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] mm: memcg-aware global reclaim
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:15:57AM -0700, Ying Han wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:39:45PM -0700, Ying Han wrote:
> > > Please consider including the following patch for the next post. It causes
> > > crash on some of the tests where sc->mem_cgroup is NULL (global kswapd).
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > index b72a844..12ab25d 100644
> > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > @@ -2768,7 +2768,8 @@ loop_again:
> > > * Do some background aging of the anon list, to
> > > give
> > > * pages a chance to be referenced before
> > > reclaiming.
> > > */
> > > - if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc))
> > > + if (scanning_global_lru(&sc) &&
> > > + inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc))
> > > shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone,
> > > &sc, priority, 0);
> >
> > Thanks! I completely overlooked this one and only noticed it after
> > changing the arguments to shrink_active_list().
> >
> > On memcg configurations, scanning_global_lru() will essentially never
> > be true again, so I moved the anon pre-aging to a separate function
> > that also does a hierarchy loop to preage the per-memcg anon lists.
> >
> > I hope to send out the next revision soon.
>
> Also, please consider to fold in the following patch as well. It fixes
> the root cgroup lru accounting and we could easily trigger OOM while
> doing some swapoff test w/o it.
This makes perfect sense. I'll incorporate this and add your
sign-offs to the original patch. Thanks very to the both of you and
sorry for the inconvenience.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists