[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110830105637.35f9e46e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:56:37 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers
> > The only programs which really care are those which map many gigs
> > of stuff into memory (IE: big databases, etc).
>
> You mean anything that mmaps a file?
> 2-3GB is not a whole lot these days.
For most stuff its a lot, and most apps that mmap files mmap the bits
they need. O_LARGEFILE and 64bit time_t do make sense though.
> 2Gb is a very similar thing as Linus y2038, just you're much more
> likely to hit it.
Also if using a 64bit time_t means less compat gunge it makes things much
easier. At that point 32bit time_t becomes a userspace/library thunking
problen.
> IMHO the only excuse right now for 32bit is to use it in a JIT
> that can dynamically expand the pointer. Or for old binaries.
Or for a lot of code which runs way faster in 32bit pointer mode. Less
memory, smaller cache footprint.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists