linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/2]slub: add a type for slab partial list position

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1314669116.29510.45.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:51:55 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2]slub: add a type for slab partial list position

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:20 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011, Alex,Shi wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:57 +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 23:25 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Adding slab to partial list head/tail is sensentive to performance.
> > > > > So adding a type to document it to avoid we get it wrong.
> > > >
> > > > I think that if you want to make it more descriptive then using the stats
> > > > values (DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL/HEAD) would avoid having to introduce an
> > > > additional enum and it would also avoid the if statement in the stat call.
> > > ok, that's better.
> > >
> > > Subject: slub: explicitly document position of inserting slab to partial list
> > >
> > > Adding slab to partial list head/tail is sensitive to performance.
> > > So explicitly uses DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL/DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD to document
> > > it to avoid we get it wrong.
> >
> > Frankly speaking, using DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL/DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD in
> > slab_alloc, slab_free make code hard to understand. Just adding some
> > comments will be more clear and understandable. like the following:
> > Do you think so?
> 
> Yes, I like that more.
fine, let me add it to the first patch


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/