[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110830141217.GF30100@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:12:17 -0500
From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@...ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>, avi@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
riel@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Ryan A Harper <raharper@...ibm.com>, kvm-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by host
* Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com> [2011-08-30 07:35]:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > Currently, when qemu stops a guest kernel that guest will issue a soft lockup
> > message when it resumes. This set provides the ability for qemu to comminucate
> > to the guest that it has been stopped. When the guest hits the watchdog on
> > resume it will check if it was suspended before issuing the warning.
> >
> > Eric B Munson (4):
> > Add flag to indicate that a vm was stopped by the host
> > Add functions to check if the host has stopped the vm
> > Add generic stubs for kvm stop check functions
> > Add check for suspended vm in softlockup detector
> >
> > arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h | 1 +
> > arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/asm-generic/pvclock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > kernel/watchdog.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/pvclock.h
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.4.1
>
> How is the host supposed to set this flag?
>
> As mentioned previously, if you save save/restore the offset added to
> kvmclock on stop/cont (and the TSC MSR, forgot to mention that), no
> paravirt infrastructure is required. Which means the issue is also fixed
> for older guests.
How is saving the offset going to prevent a large jump from triggering
the softlock message? Won't we still have not touched the watchdog for
that long period of time?
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
ryanh@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists