linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ramfs: Remove module leftovers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXWaYbooV_BX+ix8DzayFwhaACQTnwjbTuqmEV0fGU3=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:29:32 +0800
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	dchinner@...hat.com, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramfs: Remove module leftovers

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Since ramfs is hard-selected to "y", the module leftovers make
> no sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

Yeah, it makes sense to remove these module stuffs,
but I think there is no need to make exit_ramfs_fs()
be an __exit_call, so just remove exit_ramfs_fs()?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/