[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110830151704.GV9748@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:17:06 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/32] nohz: Try not to give the timekeeping duty to a
cpuset nohz cpu
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:55:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:52 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Try to give the timekeeing duty to a CPU that doesn't belong
> > to any nohz cpuset when possible, so that we increase the chance
> > for these nohz cpusets to run their CPUs out of periodic tick
> > mode.
>
> You and Dmitiri might want to get together:
>
> lkml.kernel.org/r/20110823195628.GB4533@....com
Right!
There is another missing piece in my patchset. If every non adaptive-nohz
CPUs are sleeping, then none is handling the do_timer duty and adaptive nohz
CPUs run with a stale jiffies and walltime.
I need to handle that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists