[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314718559.5812.19.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:35:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/32] nohz/cpuset: Restart tick when switching to idle
task
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:04 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > ... so basically you say:
> >
> > Restart the tick when we switch to idle.
> >
> > Now all that needs is an explanation of why..
>
> In the end we don't want to restart the tick when we switch to idle.
> But to support that I'll need to tweak various things on idle time
> accounting, otherwise the [cpu] time spent in idle is going to be
> accounted as system time.
Ok, so then the changelog should say so, preferably with a little bit
more detail on how exactly the idle time accounting would go tits-up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists