[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B3279E01@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:26:16 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings
Chris Ball wrote at Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:20 PM:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, Aug 30 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> > ---
> > This is a repost of http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg02117.html
> > I'm including it here since it's not in linux-next yet, and patch 3 depends
> > on it.
>
> I assume I should wait for patches 1+3 to appear in -next via another tree
> before I merge patch 2 -- let me know if that's incorrect.
I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing Tegra's
SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date; it relies
on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without patch 3,
the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode instead of
8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even notice 8-bit
support was missing...
Thanks for checking though.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists