linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] input: fix misc/twl6040-vibra.c warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110830140713.637b60f1.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:07:13 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: fix misc/twl6040-vibra.c warning

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:59:31 -0700 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:50:17PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> > 
> > Fix warning from Geert's build summary emails by changing "if" to
> > "ifdef".  Also handle the case of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP not enabled.
> > 
> > drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c:231:5: warning: "CONFIG_PM_SLEEP" is not defined
> > 
> > Builds cleanly with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP enabled or disabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c |   11 +++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-next-20110829.orig/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> > +++ linux-next-20110829/drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void twl6040_vibra_close(struct i
> >  	mutex_unlock(&info->mutex);
> >  }
> >  
> > -#if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 
> This is actually the only change that is needed. In case when
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not defined SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() produces empty
> 'struct dev_pm_ops' so no additional #ifdef-ing is needed.

Ah, I see.  Thanks for the info.
Do I need to resend the patch?

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/