[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5C7731.3080309@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:37:53 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Jonas Fonseca <jonas.fonseca@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 3/4] platform: (TS-5500) add LED support
On 08/29/2011 03:16 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 07:40:26PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>
>> +static void ts5500_led_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct ts5500_led *led = container_of(work, struct ts5500_led, work);
>> + u8 val = led->new_brightness ? led->bit : 0;
>> +
>> + outb(val, led->ioaddr);
>> +}
>
> Can you not do outb() from atomic context? The reason lots of LED
> drivers update the hardware in a workqueue is that they communicate with
> the hardware over buses that can't be used in atomic context like I2C or
> SPI but if that's not an issue then the workqueue is not required and
> the code can be simplified.
outb() can definitely be executed from atomic context.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists