lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL26m8KPDHPbad5y5ZYm4vY6i5TcgJ+tZSsT=r709dS9jX290Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:07:45 -0700
From:	Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc:	Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
	David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: change CPU ring buffer state from tracing_cpumask

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Vaibhav Nagarnaik
<vnagarnaik@...gle.com> wrote:
> According to Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt:
>
> tracing_cpumask:
>
>        This is a mask that lets the user only trace
>        on specified CPUS. The format is a hex string
>        representing the CPUS.
>
> The tracing_cpumask currently doesn't affect the tracing state of
> per-CPU ring buffers.
>
> This patch enables/disables CPU recording as its corresponding bit in
> tracing_cpumask is set/unset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index e8aa324..d8ed798 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -2433,10 +2433,12 @@ tracing_cpumask_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>                if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tracing_cpumask) &&
>                                !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tracing_cpumask_new)) {
>                        atomic_inc(&global_trace.data[cpu]->disabled);
> +                       ring_buffer_record_disable_cpu(global_trace.buffer, cpu);
>                }
>                if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tracing_cpumask) &&
>                                cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tracing_cpumask_new)) {
>                        atomic_dec(&global_trace.data[cpu]->disabled);
> +                       ring_buffer_record_enable_cpu(global_trace.buffer, cpu);
>                }
>        }
>        arch_spin_unlock(&ftrace_max_lock);

Hi Steve

What do you think about this patch?

Vaibhav Nagarnaik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ