linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4yc+chiSh0wf_5sZk-Eh0vm-HSDZv+gFQi86LhCAUXTvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:45:20 +0800
From:	Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v5] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v5

> +Interaction with the GPIO subsystem
> +===================================
> +
> +The GPIO drivers may want to perform operations of various types on the
> same
> +physical pins that are also registered as GPIO pins.
> +
> +Since the pin controller subsystem have its pinspace local to the pin
> +controller we need a mapping so that the pin control subsystem can figure
> out
> +which pin controller handles control of a certain GPIO pin. Since a single
> +pin controller may be muxing several GPIO ranges (typically SoCs that have
> +one set of pins but internally several GPIO silicon blocks, each modeled as
> +a struct gpio_chip) any number of GPIO ranges can be added to a pin
> controller
> +instance like this:
> +
> +struct gpio_chip chip_a;
> +struct gpio_chip chip_b;
> +
> +static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range_a = {
> +	.name = "chip a",
> +	.id = 0,
> +	.base = 32,
> +	.npins = 16,
> +	.gc = &chip_a;
> +};
> +
> +static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range_a = {
> +	.name = "chip b",
> +	.id = 0,
> +	.base = 48,
> +	.npins = 8,
> +	.gc = &chip_b;
> +};
> +
> +
> +{
> +	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl;
> +	...
> +	pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl, &gpio_range_a);
> +	pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl, &gpio_range_b);

people might like a pinctrl_add_gpio_range*s* too.

-barry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/