[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110831111954.GB17512@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:19:54 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] compaction: compact unevictable page
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:37:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Now compaction doesn't handle mlocked page as it uses __isolate_lru_page
> which doesn't consider unevicatable page. It has been used by just lumpy so
> it was pointless that it isolates unevictable page. But the situation is
> changed. Compaction could handle unevictable page and it can help getting
> big contiguos pages in fragment memory by many pinned page with mlock.
This may result in applications unexpectedly faulting and waiting on
mlocked pages under migration. I wonder how realtime people feel
about that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists