[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1108302021530.20358@xanadu.home>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] msm: devboard defconfigs
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, David Brown wrote:
> Unless Russell objects, and prefers these to be in his tree, I'm fine
> with having these in a branch for linux-next that isn't merged
> upstream for now.
>
> The following changes since commit c6a389f123b9f68d605bb7e0f9b32ec1e3e14132:
>
> Linux 3.1-rc4 (2011-08-28 21:16:01 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/davidb/linux-msm.git msm-defconfig
>
> David Brown (1):
> ARM: msm: defconfigs for Qualcomm dev boards
>
> arch/arm/configs/msm7x30_defconfig | 68 +++++++++
> arch/arm/configs/msm8660_defconfig | 96 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/configs/msm8960_defconfig | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/configs/qsd8x50_defconfig | 82 +++++++++++
What prevents you from merging them together?
Can't you build a single kernel binary with support for allMSM targets?
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists