[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72039.1314830494@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:41:34 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Yet another pass at machine check recovery
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:21:37 PDT, "Luck, Tony" said:
> Scaled down ambitions ... this version just goes for recovery of
> data errors detected in user mode.
Two slightly different versions showed up here almost on top of each other.
Which one should we be looking at? Or do you want us to ignore both and you do
another one with REPOST in the subject?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists