linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] cgroup: kill subsys->can_attach_task(), pre_attach() and attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110831070313.GA29179@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:03:13 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, matthltc@...ibm.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] cgroup: kill subsys->can_attach_task(), pre_attach()
 and attach_task()

Hello, Frederic.

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:10:32PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> In order to keep the fix queued in -mm (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/262)
> the tasks that have failed to migrate should be removed from the iterator
> so that they are not included in the batch in ->attach().

I don't think that's a good approach.  It breaks the symmetry when
calling different callbacks.  What if ->can_attach() allocates
per-task resources and the task exits in the middle?  I think we
better lock down fork/exit/exec.  I'll send patches but I'm currently
moving / traveling w/ limited access to my toys so it might take some
time.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/