| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110831090850.GA27345@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:08:50 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] memcg: skip scanning active lists based on individual size
Reclaim decides to skip scanning an active list when the corresponding
inactive list is above a certain size in comparison to leave the
assumed working set alone while there are still enough reclaim
candidates around.
The memcg implementation of comparing those lists instead reports
whether the whole memcg is low on the requested type of inactive
pages, considering all nodes and zones.
This can lead to an oversized active list not being scanned because of
the state of the other lists in the memcg, as well as an active list
being scanned while its corresponding inactive list has enough pages.
Not only is this wrong, it's also a scalability hazard, because the
global memory state over all nodes and zones has to be gathered for
each memcg and zone scanned.
Make these calculations purely based on the size of the two LRU lists
that are actually affected by the outcome of the decision.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 10 +++++---
mm/memcontrol.c | 51 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------
mm/vmscan.c | 4 +-
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 343bd76..cbb45ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -105,8 +105,10 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
/*
* For memory reclaim.
*/
-int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
-int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct zone *zone);
+int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct zone *zone);
int mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
unsigned long mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid, int zid, unsigned int lrumask);
@@ -292,13 +294,13 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_disabled(void)
}
static inline int
-mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
{
return 1;
}
static inline int
-mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
{
return 1;
}
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3508777..d63dfb2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1101,15 +1101,19 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *mem)
return ret;
}
-static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_pages)
+int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
{
- unsigned long active;
+ unsigned long inactive_ratio;
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
unsigned long inactive;
+ unsigned long active;
unsigned long gb;
- unsigned long inactive_ratio;
- inactive = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_ANON));
- active = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_ANON));
+ inactive = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_ANON));
+ active = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_ANON));
gb = (inactive + active) >> (30 - PAGE_SHIFT);
if (gb)
@@ -1117,39 +1121,20 @@ static int calc_inactive_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long *present_
else
inactive_ratio = 1;
- if (present_pages) {
- present_pages[0] = inactive;
- present_pages[1] = active;
- }
-
- return inactive_ratio;
+ return inactive * inactive_ratio < active;
}
-int mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
-{
- unsigned long active;
- unsigned long inactive;
- unsigned long present_pages[2];
- unsigned long inactive_ratio;
-
- inactive_ratio = calc_inactive_ratio(memcg, present_pages);
-
- inactive = present_pages[0];
- active = present_pages[1];
-
- if (inactive * inactive_ratio < active)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+int mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct zone *zone)
{
unsigned long active;
unsigned long inactive;
+ int zid = zone_idx(zone);
+ int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
- inactive = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE));
- active = mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_FILE));
+ inactive = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ BIT(LRU_INACTIVE_FILE));
+ active = mem_cgroup_zone_nr_lru_pages(memcg, nid, zid,
+ BIT(LRU_ACTIVE_FILE));
return (active > inactive);
}
@@ -4188,8 +4173,6 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
- cb->fill(cb, "inactive_ratio", calc_inactive_ratio(mem_cont, NULL));
-
{
int nid, zid;
struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 6588746..a023778 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ static int inactive_anon_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
low = inactive_anon_is_low_global(zone);
else
- low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup);
+ low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup, zone);
return low;
}
#else
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static int inactive_file_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
low = inactive_file_is_low_global(zone);
else
- low = mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup);
+ low = mem_cgroup_inactive_file_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup, zone);
return low;
}
--
1.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists