| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20110901.105629.2264978229399750709.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:56:29 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: peterz@...radead.org Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: process time < thread time? From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:54:19 +0200 > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:39 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> > I think we just deadlocked: >> >> That's why I said untested :) > > the below seems to build boot and give consistent output.. Works here too. > Reported-by: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-nk5489zjtxsln3ixjonjs3h3@git.kernel.org Tested-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists