linux-kernel - Re: comparison of the AF_ALG interface with the /dev/crypto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110901150838.GA31988@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:08:38 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@...tls.org>
Cc:	Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, cryptodev-linux-devel@....org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: comparison of the AF_ALG interface with the /dev/crypto

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:06:06PM +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
> Indeed but today that's what we have in some systems. User-space TLS
> implementations (GnuTLS and OpenSSL) and kernel-space crypto
> offloading. The purpose of the /dev/crypto and AF_ALG interfaces is to
> connect those together. It would be interesting to have a partial
> kernel-space TLS implementation but I don't know whether such a thing
> could ever make it to kernel.

Well we've talked about a kernel implementation of the data path
previously and I don't think there is any opposition to the idea.

The only thing missing is an implementation.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/