linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: addition to DMA API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1109011244340.1896-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:48:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: addition to DMA API

On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Ming Lei wrote:

> > Suppose A and B are _both_ part of the dma descriptor.  The device
> > might see A==1 and B==0, if the memory accesses occur like this:
> >
> >        CPU             device
> >        ---             ------
> >        A = 1;
> >        wmb();
> >                        read B
> >                        read A
> >        B = 2;
> >
> > When this happens, the device will observe a non-atomic update of the
> > descriptor.  There's no way to prevent this.
> 
> If device doesn't find that B is 2, it will not fetch descriptor of A,
> and will observe
> a atomic update, which is just EHCI does for many cases(such as 4.10.2).

You didn't read what I wrote above.  Suppose A and B are _both_ part of 
the same descriptor, like hw_token and hw_qtd_next.


> > The memory barrier in your qh_link_async() example can make sure that
> > the device always sees consistent data.  It doesn't guarantee that the
> > write to head->hw->hw_next will be flushed to memory in a reasonably
> > short time, which is the problem you are trying to solve.
> 
> Yes, up to now, it is the only case in which the flush can address to,
> and in which kind of cases device will poll DMA coherent memory contiguously,
> I am not sure if there are other devices except for EHCI(maybe have uhci/ohci).

Yes: UHCI, OHCI, EHCI, and XHCI all poll memory constantly.

> If there are many such kind of devices, the flush operation introduced will
> make sense.
> 
> As far as I know, for most of devices, dma operation of bus master is triggered
> by writing into mmio register instead of writing into coherent memory, and the
> flush is not required in this case surely.

That's right.  It is needed only when the device polls automatically.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/