[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5FDBDC.2030302@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:24:12 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>, avi@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
riel@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
aliguori@...ibm.com, raharper@...ibm.com, kvm-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by
host
On 08/30/2011 07:26 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:27:11PM -0600, Eric B Munson wrote:
>> Currently, when qemu stops a guest kernel that guest will issue a soft lockup
>> message when it resumes. This set provides the ability for qemu to comminucate
>> to the guest that it has been stopped. When the guest hits the watchdog on
>> resume it will check if it was suspended before issuing the warning.
>>
>> Eric B Munson (4):
>> Add flag to indicate that a vm was stopped by the host
>> Add functions to check if the host has stopped the vm
>> Add generic stubs for kvm stop check functions
>> Add check for suspended vm in softlockup detector
>>
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> include/asm-generic/pvclock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> kernel/watchdog.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/pvclock.h
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.4.1
>
> How is the host supposed to set this flag?
>
> As mentioned previously, if you save save/restore the offset added to
> kvmclock on stop/cont (and the TSC MSR, forgot to mention that), no
> paravirt infrastructure is required. Which means the issue is also fixed
> for older guests.
IIRC, the steal time patches have some logic that basically say:
if there was steal time:
kick soft lockup detector
I wonder if that serves this purpose provided that time spent in stop is
accounted as steal time. If it isn't, perhaps it should be?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists