[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110901203031.GB15185@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:30:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Hyper-V TODO file
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:27:33PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:16:51PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > 2) With your help, we have fixed all of the issues related to these drivers
> > conforming to the Linux Device Driver model. One of the TODO work items is
> > "audit the vmbus to verify it is working properly with the driver model".
>
> I have a few comments about this, I'll respond in another email.
Ok, it looks a _lot_ better, but I have a few minor nits, and one larger
one:
- rename the vmbus_child_* functions to vmbus_* as there's no need to
think of "children" here.
- vmbus_onoffer comment is incorrect. You handle offers from lots of
other types. Or if not, am I reading the code incorrectly?
- the static hv_cb_utils array needs to go away. In the hv_utils.c
util_probe() call, properly register the channel callback, and the
same goes for the util_remove() call, unregister things there.
Note, you can use the driver_data field to determine exactly which
callback needs to be registered to make things easy. Something like
the following (pseudo code only):
static const struct hv_vmbus_device_id id_table[] = {
/* Shutdown guid */
{ VMBUS_DEVICE(0x31, 0x60, 0x0B, 0X0E, 0x13, 0x52, 0x34, 0x49,
0x81, 0x8B, 0x38, 0XD9, 0x0C, 0xED, 0x39, 0xDB),
.driver_data = &shutdown_onchannelcallback },
....
};
util_probe(struct hv_device *dev, const struct hv_vmbus_device_id *id)
[ Yes, you will have to change the probe callback signature, but that's fine. ]
{
void *fn(void *context);
u8 *buffer;
fn = id->driver_data;
buffer = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
/* Hook up callback and buffer with a call to the proper vmbus
* function
*/
...
}
util_remove()
{
/* undo what you did in util_probe(), unhooking the callback and
* freeing the data */
}
Does that make any sense?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists