[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110901020947.GA9096@zhy>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:09:47 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: sifram rajas <sifram.rajas@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: General question about TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and schedule_timeout()
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0530, sifram rajas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a general question about the following 2 lines of code I see
> all over the kernel:
> 1 set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) ;
> 2 schedule_timeout(<some value>);
>
> In the above code, if we encounter an interrupt after executing line
> 1, we will end up
> call schedule() from the architecture specific code for CONFIG_PREEMPT
> kernels, after
> the interrupt handler has been invokled.
Yes.
>
> This will cause the current task to sleep interruptibly forever
> instead of for a certain timeout interval.
No.
schedule() will not put an preempted task to sleep, see:
asmlinkage void __sched schduule(void)
{
...
if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev))) {
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
} else {
...
}
}
...
}
Thanks,
Yong
>
> Won't this defeat the purpose of the above code to schedule out or
> sleep for a certain finite timeout ?
> If yes, then what are the techniques to solve this problem ?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sifram.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Only stand for myself
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists