[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314855311.4145.8.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:35:11 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: nacc@...ibm.com, miltonm@....com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vinod.koul@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dma-mapping: add get_required_mask if arch
overrides default
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:05:23 -0700
> Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
> >
> > If an architecture sets ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK and has settable
> > dma_map_ops, the required mask may change by the ops implementation.
> > For example, a system that always has an mmu inline may only require 32
> > bits while a swiotlb would desire bits to cover all of memory.
> >
> > Therefore add the field if the architecture does not use the generic
> > definition of dma_get_required_mask. The first use will by by powerpc.
> > Note that this does add some dependency on the order in which files are
> > visible here.
.../...
> If you add get_required_mask to dma_map_ops, we should clean up ia64
> too and implement the generic proper version in
> dma-mapping-common.h. Then we kill ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK
> ifdef hack. Otherwise, I don't think it makes sense to add this to
> dma_map_ops.
In the meantime, can I have an ack so I can include this along with the
rest of Milton's patches ? It's been around for a while now :-)
I'm a bit late for producing a powerpc-next (due to travelling).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists