[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZy0LokSNmzb-9FnAkc-61gp+_G07JuTxTEssqSUjtcVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:57:28 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stijn Devriendt <highguy@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] drivers: create a pin control subsystem
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Stijn Devriendt <highguy@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> wrote:
>> + if (desc->mux_requested) {
>> + pr_err("pin already requested\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> Isn't locking missing here?
You're right, I have now introduced a spinlock to the pin descriptor
and take that before reading or writing descriptor fields like this.
Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists