[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1314951871.1301.2.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:24:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] nohz: Move rcu dynticks idle mode handling to
idle enter/exit APIs
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 18:41 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Now we could possibly add magic to rcu_read_unlock_special() to restart
> > the tick in that case.
>
> Not from NMI handlers we can't. Unless I am really confused about the
> code that restarts the tick. Which is not impossible, but ...
Uhm.. good point ;-) yes that will be somewhat detrimental to the
overall OS health if we attempt such a thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists