[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110902000958.GE1919@count0.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:09:58 -0700
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
"containers@...ts.osdl.org" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/map_files/
directory v6
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:58:29AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > What additional kernel patches are required to bring that effort to a
> > usable state and where are those patches?
>
> * The one you've already accepted with ->statfs for pipefs.
> * PTRACE_SEIZE set from Tejun (RFC was sent some time earlier)
> * CLONE_USEPID flag for the clone() syscall (Cyrill will re-send a bit later)
Is that the last CLONE_ flag? Does it fully support nesting of pid namespaces?
What happened to the idea of using the existing eclone patches instead?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists