[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E613730.4080508@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:06:08 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de, anton@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tool: fix endianness handling of u32 data in samples
On 09/02/2011 02:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:41:51PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> @@ -423,18 +449,25 @@ int perf_event__parse_sample(const union perf_event *event, u64 type,
>> }
>>
>> if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
>> - u32 *p = (u32 *)array;
>> + u.val64 = *array;
>> + if (swapped) {
>> + /* undo swap of u64, then swap on individual u32s */
>> + u.val64 = bswap_64(u.val64);
>> + u.val32[0] = bswap_32(u.val32[0]);
>> + u.val32[1] = bswap_32(u.val32[1]);
>> +
>> + WARN_ONCE(swapped, "Endianness of raw data not corrected!\n");
>> + }
>
> That works too, but then we'll be always testing swapped two times :-)
>
> - Arnaldo
I did not see a WARN_ONCE with no 'condition' variable, so I went with
the redundant test. I guess swapped really could be changed to '1' --
like an example I saw in the acpi code.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists