[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd8gLN4C54Ey5uuK+_FY0U+tBf4aHntX=B+d0eNgY=rNsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 18:09:38 +0900
From: NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vfat filesystem: Why utf8=1 when iocharset=”utf8” was already there?
2011/9/2 Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>:
> From my opinion both should support the same functionality as the
> motive behind this seems to introduce the complete support for utf8.
> But, I am surprised to see the behavior changes in the ‘2’ options.
> 1) When using iocharset=”utf8” it makes vfat case sensitive, while
> this is not the case with using utf8=1
> 2) Surrogate pair don’t work when using iocharset=”utf8”, because that
> traverses a path like this:
> xlate_to_uni()-->nls->char2uni()-->char2uni()-->utf8_to_utf32()
> After this it returns EINVAL because Surrogate pair correct code is
> greater than 0xFFFF (MAX_WCHAR_T – limit which is put)
> But this is not the case with utf8=1
> There are other places also where I can see usage different due to
> usage of char2uni()
>
> Can someone provide any help on this? Why do we have separate options
> for using utf8 and if utf8=1 smoothly supports proper working then why
> not discard iocharset=”utf8” ? and if this is not the case
> why was utf8=1 introduced?
>
> Please provide any guidance in this.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amit Sahrawat
>
I also am wondering this issue for long time.
May be, Ogawa will know well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists