[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b6a2b8e-365f-4155-85ca-5f72b46a7f3e@email.android.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:40:55 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Subject: Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:16 +0200, Arnd Bergmann said:
>
>(Admittedly, I'm tuning in late on this discussion, but...)
>
>> For the ioctl interface however, the __u64/__s64 type in the x32 ABI
>> must be defined with __attribute__((packed,aligned(4))) to match what
>> the kernel implements because it emulates the x86-32 ABI.
>
>Is this a cast-in-stone issue, or is it still not too late to change
>that?
>And if we change that, can we simplify anything?
The complexity of changing that would be enormous.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists