[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKnu2Mq=4Y=hiv-R7PvPyYCYmo9enu6_FPcoT089LxSa=_xMhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:08:05 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Rasmussen <Sebastian.Rasmussen@...ricsson.com>,
Ulf Hansson <Ulf.Hansson@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: RFC : mmc : Use wait_for_completion_timeout() instead of
wait_for_completion in case of multiple write blocks.
2011/9/2 NamJae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>:
> We should consider DMA situation. As I know, host controller can not
> rise timeout interrupt in write not read in DMA status.
Which host controller are you talking about?
> host
> controller can just know whether card is finish to program to use busy
> line. If unstable card is holding busy line while writing using DMA,
> hang problem will happen by wait_for_completion.
> so I think that mmc driver need some exception to avoid this problem.
Yes you can add a timeout in the driver itself. Just set up
a common timer, no big deal.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists