[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110903224155.GG7761@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 00:41:55 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, lenb@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] Rename the "llist" (lockless list) to "llstack" (lockless stack)
I don't see why a rename is necessary. People implement stacks and queues
and all other kinds of data structures using the standard list.h.
No reason why this shouldn't work with llist.h either.
I would assume everyone hacking on the Linux kernel will understand
that a list can be used as a building block for all of these.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists