Add two fields to task_struct. 1) account dirtied pages in the individual tasks, for accuracy 2) per-task balance_dirty_pages() call intervals, for flexibility The balance_dirty_pages() call interval (ie. nr_dirtied_pause) will scale near-sqrt to the safety gap between dirty pages and threshold. The main problem of per-task nr_dirtied is, if 1k+ tasks start dirtying pages at exactly the same time, each task will be assigned a large initial nr_dirtied_pause, so that the dirty threshold will be exceeded long before each task reached its nr_dirtied_pause and hence call balance_dirty_pages(). The solution is to watch for the number of pages dirtied on each CPU in between the calls into balance_dirty_pages(). If it exceeds ratelimit_pages (3% dirty threshold), force call balance_dirty_pages() for a chance to set bdi->dirty_exceeded. In normal situations, this safeguarding condition is not expected to trigger at all. peter: keep the per-CPU ratelimit for safeguarding the 1k+ tasks case CC: Peter Zijlstra Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang --- include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++ kernel/fork.c | 3 + mm/page-writeback.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) --- linux-next.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2011-08-29 19:07:56.000000000 +0800 +++ linux-next/include/linux/sched.h 2011-08-29 19:08:19.000000000 +0800 @@ -1521,6 +1521,13 @@ struct task_struct { int make_it_fail; #endif struct prop_local_single dirties; + /* + * when (nr_dirtied >= nr_dirtied_pause), it's time to call + * balance_dirty_pages() for some dirty throttling pause + */ + int nr_dirtied; + int nr_dirtied_pause; + #ifdef CONFIG_LATENCYTOP int latency_record_count; struct latency_record latency_record[LT_SAVECOUNT]; --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-29 19:08:05.000000000 +0800 +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-29 19:08:19.000000000 +0800 @@ -54,20 +54,6 @@ */ static long ratelimit_pages = 32; -/* - * When balance_dirty_pages decides that the caller needs to perform some - * non-background writeback, this is how many pages it will attempt to write. - * It should be somewhat larger than dirtied pages to ensure that reasonably - * large amounts of I/O are submitted. - */ -static inline long sync_writeback_pages(unsigned long dirtied) -{ - if (dirtied < ratelimit_pages) - dirtied = ratelimit_pages; - - return dirtied + dirtied / 2; -} - /* The following parameters are exported via /proc/sys/vm */ /* @@ -229,6 +215,8 @@ static void update_completion_period(voi int shift = calc_period_shift(); prop_change_shift(&vm_completions, shift); prop_change_shift(&vm_dirties, shift); + + writeback_set_ratelimit(); } int dirty_background_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, @@ -982,6 +970,23 @@ static void bdi_update_bandwidth(struct } /* + * After a task dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() + * will look to see if it needs to start dirty throttling. + * + * If dirty_poll_interval is too low, big NUMA machines will call the expensive + * global_page_state() too often. So scale it near-sqrt to the safety margin + * (the number of pages we may dirty without exceeding the dirty limits). + */ +static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval(unsigned long dirty, + unsigned long thresh) +{ + if (thresh > dirty) + return 1UL << (ilog2(thresh - dirty) >> 1); + + return 1; +} + +/* * balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty * data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force * the caller to perform writeback if the system is over `vm_dirty_ratio'. @@ -1113,6 +1118,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a if (clear_dirty_exceeded && bdi->dirty_exceeded) bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0; + current->nr_dirtied = 0; + current->nr_dirtied_pause = dirty_poll_interval(nr_dirty, dirty_thresh); + if (writeback_in_progress(bdi)) return; @@ -1139,7 +1147,7 @@ void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page } } -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, bdp_ratelimits) = 0; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bdp_ratelimits); /** * balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr - balance dirty memory state @@ -1159,31 +1167,39 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr( unsigned long nr_pages_dirtied) { struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info; - unsigned long ratelimit; - unsigned long *p; + int ratelimit; + int *p; if (!bdi_cap_account_dirty(bdi)) return; - ratelimit = ratelimit_pages; - if (mapping->backing_dev_info->dirty_exceeded) - ratelimit = 8; + ratelimit = current->nr_dirtied_pause; + if (bdi->dirty_exceeded) + ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10)); + + current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied; + preempt_disable(); /* - * Check the rate limiting. Also, we do not want to throttle real-time - * tasks in balance_dirty_pages(). Period. + * This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without + * calling into balance_dirty_pages(), which can happen when there are + * 1000+ tasks, all of them start dirtying pages at exactly the same + * time, hence all honoured too large initial task->nr_dirtied_pause. */ - preempt_disable(); p = &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits); - *p += nr_pages_dirtied; - if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit)) { - ratelimit = sync_writeback_pages(*p); + if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit)) *p = 0; - preempt_enable(); - balance_dirty_pages(mapping, ratelimit); - return; + else { + *p += nr_pages_dirtied; + if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) { + *p = 0; + ratelimit = 0; + } } preempt_enable(); + + if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit)) + balance_dirty_pages(mapping, current->nr_dirtied); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr); @@ -1278,22 +1294,17 @@ void laptop_sync_completion(void) * * Here we set ratelimit_pages to a level which ensures that when all CPUs are * dirtying in parallel, we cannot go more than 3% (1/32) over the dirty memory - * thresholds before writeback cuts in. - * - * But the limit should not be set too high. Because it also controls the - * amount of memory which the balance_dirty_pages() caller has to write back. - * If this is too large then the caller will block on the IO queue all the - * time. So limit it to four megabytes - the balance_dirty_pages() caller - * will write six megabyte chunks, max. + * thresholds. */ void writeback_set_ratelimit(void) { - ratelimit_pages = vm_total_pages / (num_online_cpus() * 32); + unsigned long background_thresh; + unsigned long dirty_thresh; + global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh); + ratelimit_pages = dirty_thresh / (num_online_cpus() * 32); if (ratelimit_pages < 16) ratelimit_pages = 16; - if (ratelimit_pages * PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > 4096 * 1024) - ratelimit_pages = (4096 * 1024) / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; } static int __cpuinit --- linux-next.orig/kernel/fork.c 2011-08-29 19:07:56.000000000 +0800 +++ linux-next/kernel/fork.c 2011-08-29 19:08:19.000000000 +0800 @@ -1329,6 +1329,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process( p->pdeath_signal = 0; p->exit_state = 0; + p->nr_dirtied = 0; + p->nr_dirtied_pause = 128 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10); + /* * Ok, make it visible to the rest of the system. * We dont wake it up yet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/