[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1315234621-26694-3-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:57:01 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
To: <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/amd: Don't take domain->lock recursivly
The domain_flush_devices() function takes the domain->lock.
But this function is only called from update_domain() which
itself is already called unter the domain->lock. This causes
a deadlock situation when the dma-address-space of a domain
grows larger than 1GB.
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
---
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index 4565223..0e4227f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -847,14 +847,9 @@ static void domain_flush_complete(struct protection_domain *domain)
static void domain_flush_devices(struct protection_domain *domain)
{
struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(dev_data, &domain->dev_list, list)
device_flush_dte(dev_data);
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->lock, flags);
}
/****************************************************************************
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists