lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110905151917.GD3889@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:19:24 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regmap bulk read styles.

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:49:14PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> The burst read is pretty much what you have covered by
> regmap_bulk_read. I assume an implementation for spi
> doing

> TX Addr1 XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
> RX XXXXX Data1 Data2 Data3 Data4 ...

> would be general enough to be worth providing? Any device
> that doesn't understand this should simply not use it.

Yes, that's the assumption the code is making for all buses.

> The second is more interesting.  It actually looks quite like
> your gather write.  We have a set of registers that we need
> to read.  A classic example is that a coherent set will only
> be received (e.g. valid at an instant in time) if we read
> all channels of an accelerometer in one go (between chip selects).

> Would you be in favour of an interface to handle this use case
> or is it better just to bypass regmap for this use case?
> (which would be a pity as it leads to duplication as all the
> configuration stuff fits nicely).

If you can come up with a tasteful interface for doing this I wouldn't
object but my suspicion is that it's going to be easier to reimplement.
It does seem useful, I'm just worried about how the interface would
look.

> As an aside, isn't your gather write more typically described
> as a scatter write?  (writes one coherent set to a number of
> disjoint locations?)

On the write side it's generally a gather (reading from different
locations and writing out a continuous stream) while on the read side
it's generally a scatter (reading a continuous data stream and writing
it to multiple locations).  The gather here refers to getting data from
more than one place and using it to transmit a single byte stream.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ