linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix regmap compilation with CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E6528CD.7080003@metafoo.de>
Date:	Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:53:49 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix regmap compilation with CONFIG_DEBUGFS=n

On 09/05/2011 09:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:29:38PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> With CONFIG_DEBUGFS disabled the regmap compilation fails with the following
>> errors:
> 
>> 	drivers/base/regmap/regcache.o: In function `regmap_debugfs_initcall':
>> 	drivers/base/regmap/internal.h:96: multiple definition of `regmap_debugfs_initcall'
>> 	drivers/base/regmap/regmap.o:drivers/base/regmap/internal.h:96: first defined here
>> 	drivers/base/regmap/regcache.o: In function `regmap_debugfs_init':
> 
> I sense that this doesn't actually happen in mainline...

Uhm, yes... the patch is still valid though, want me to resubmit it with a
different patch description?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/