lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2722845.TegCUU4bu0@wuerfel>
Date:	Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:48 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Subject: Re: RFD: x32 ABI system call numbers

On Sunday 04 September 2011 15:13:18 H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 September 2011 14:25:53 H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> >> >> #define __NR_x32_recvfrom
> >> >> >> #define __NR_x32_sendmsg
> >> >> >> #define __NR_x32_recvmsg
> >> >> >> #define __NR_x32_recvmmsg
> >> >> >> #define __NR_x32_sendmmsg
> >> >> >
> >> >> > These today use the MSG_CMSG_COMPAT flag to distinguish native and compat
> >> >> > calls. Do you plan to have another flag here to handle cmsg time values?
> >> >>
> >> >> I am using x86-32 calls for them.
> >> >
> >> > But isn't that broken? These all pass u64 or time_t values at some point.
> >> >
> >>
> >> time_t isn't a problem since time_t/timeval/timespec are identical for
> >> x32 and x86-64.  As for u64, I added NATIVE_LONG_TYPE, which is
> >> defined as long long for x32,  and use it instead of long in types for
> >> 64bit system calls.
> >
> > Sorry, I misread you as saying you use the compat syscalls for these.
> > If you use the native 64 bit syscalls, you have the opposite problem:
> > Some network protocols (e.g. netlink or rxrpc) use other data structures
> > that require conversion, e.g. 'long' members that x32 will get wrong.
> 
> For those, I use x86-32 calls.

So to ask again, what do you plan to do about SCM_TIMESTAMP*?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ