[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E649C81.3070203@metafoo.de>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:55:13 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Graeme Gregory <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Samuel Oritz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] regmap: Introduce caching support
On 09/05/2011 11:43 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> [...]
>>> /**
>>> * Default value for a register. We use an array of structs rather
>>> * than a simple array as many modern devices have very sparse
>>> @@ -50,9 +55,11 @@ struct reg_default {
>>> * (eg, a clear on read interrupt status register).
>>> *
>>> * @max_register: Optional, specifies the maximum valid register index.
>>> - * @reg_defaults: Power on reset values for registers (for use with
>>> - * register cache support).
>>> - * @num_reg_defaults: Number of elements in reg_defaults.
>>> + *
>>> + * @cache_type: The actual cache type.
>>> + * @cache_defaults_raw: Power on reset values for registers (for use with
>>> + * register cache support).
>>> + * @num_cache_defaults_raw: Number of elements in cache_defaults_raw.
>>> */
>>> struct regmap_config {
>>> int reg_bits;
>>> @@ -64,8 +71,10 @@ struct regmap_config {
>>> bool (*precious_reg)(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg);
>>>
>>> unsigned int max_register;
>>> - struct reg_default *reg_defaults;
>>> - int num_reg_defaults;
>>
>> I guess these were removed by accident due to some merge conflict as they were
>> added just recently. It would be good if you could re-add them and if they are
>> set initialize cache_defaults using a memdup instead of reading cache_defaults_raw.
>>
>>> +
>>> + enum regcache_type cache_type;
>>> + const void *cache_defaults_raw;
>>> + unsigned num_cache_defaults_raw;
>>> };
>>>
>>> typedef int (*regmap_hw_write)(struct device *dev, const void *data,
>
> I was merely renaming these.
And you changed the type. We need the reg_default type register defaults for
devices which have a sparse registers set or where the base register address is
at a larger offset.
- Lars
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists