lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109061538270.24588@cl320.eecs.utk.edu>
Date:	Tue, 6 Sep 2011 15:43:09 -0400
From:	Vince Weaver <vweaver1@...s.utk.edu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Mike Hommey <mh@...ndium.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with perf hardware counters grouping

On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> Both those have 4 generic hardware counters, but x86 defaults to
> enabling the NMI watchdog which takes one, leaving you with 3 (try: echo
> 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog). If you had looked at your dmesg
> output you'd have found lines like:
> 
>   NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
> 
> The code can only check if the group as a whole could possibly fit on a
> PMU, which is where your failure on >4 comes from.
> 
> What happens with your >3 case is that while the group is valid and
> could fit on the PMU, it won't fit at runtime because the NMI watchdog
> is taking one and won't budge (cpu-pinned counter have precedence over
> any other kind), effectively starving your group of pmu runtime.
> 
> Also, we should fix that return to say -EINVAL or so.

So any hope of a fix on this?  

As mentioned this is a serious problem for PAPI and I am trying to find a 
good way to enable a workaround in a way that doesn't punish people who 
have the watchdog disabled.

Is there a "stable" API method of determining if the nmi_watchdog is 
present and stealing a perf-counter?  

If I find a "1" in /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog can I assume a counter is 
being stolen?

Vince

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ