[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1315332049-2604-41-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:00:35 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 41/55] rcu: Permit rt_mutex_unlock() with irqs disabled
From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Create a separate lockdep class for the rt_mutex used for RCU priority
boosting and enable use of rt_mutex_lock() with irqs disabled. This
prevents RCU priority boosting from falling prey to deadlocks when
someone begins an RCU read-side critical section in preemptible state,
but releases it with an irq-disabled lock held.
Unfortunately, the scheduler's runqueue and priority-inheritance locks
still must either completely enclose or be completely enclosed by any
overlapping RCU read-side critical section.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/rtmutex.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index d3127e8..f6c63ea 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -1149,6 +1149,8 @@ static void rcu_initiate_boost_trace(struct rcu_node *rnp)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_boost_class;
+
/*
* Carry out RCU priority boosting on the task indicated by ->exp_tasks
* or ->boost_tasks, advancing the pointer to the next task in the
@@ -1211,10 +1213,14 @@ static int rcu_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp)
*/
t = container_of(tb, struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&mtx, t);
+ /* Avoid lockdep false positives. This rt_mutex is its own thing. */
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(&mtx.wait_lock, &rcu_boost_class,
+ "rcu_boost_mutex");
t->rcu_boost_mutex = &mtx;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
rt_mutex_lock(&mtx); /* Side effect: boosts task t's priority. */
rt_mutex_unlock(&mtx); /* Keep lockdep happy. */
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
return rnp->exp_tasks != NULL || rnp->boost_tasks != NULL;
}
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index ab44911..2548f44 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -579,6 +579,7 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
int ret = 0;
+ int was_disabled;
for (;;) {
/* Try to acquire the lock: */
@@ -601,10 +602,17 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+ was_disabled = irqs_disabled();
+ if (was_disabled)
+ local_irq_enable();
+
debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
schedule_rt_mutex(lock);
+ if (was_disabled)
+ local_irq_disable();
+
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
set_current_state(state);
}
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists