linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/55] rcu: Not necessary to pass rcu_read_lock_held() to rcu_dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1315332049-2604-24-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue,  6 Sep 2011 11:00:18 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	patches@...aro.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/55] rcu: Not necessary to pass rcu_read_lock_held() to rcu_dereference_protected()

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>

Since ca5ecddf (rcu: define __rcu address space modifier for sparse)
rcu_dereference_check() use rcu_read_lock_held() as a part of condition
automatically.  Therefore, callers of rcu_dereference_check() no longer
need to pass rcu_read_lock_held() to rcu_dereference_check().

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt |   10 ++++------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
index d7a49b2..4998c63 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
@@ -48,13 +48,11 @@ checking of rcu_dereference() primitives:
 		value of the pointer itself, for example, against NULL.
 
 The rcu_dereference_check() check expression can be any boolean
-expression, but would normally include one of the rcu_read_lock_held()
-family of functions and a lockdep expression.  However, any boolean
-expression can be used.  For a moderately ornate example, consider
-the following:
+expression, but would normally include a lockdep expression.  However,
+any boolean expression can be used.  For a moderately ornate example,
+consider the following:
 
 	file = rcu_dereference_check(fdt->fd[fd],
-				     rcu_read_lock_held() ||
 				     lockdep_is_held(&files->file_lock) ||
 				     atomic_read(&files->count) == 1);
 
@@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ This expression picks up the pointer "fdt->fd[fd]" in an RCU-safe manner,
 and, if CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is configured, verifies that this expression
 is used in:
 
-1.	An RCU read-side critical section, or
+1.	An RCU read-side critical section (implicit), or
 2.	with files->file_lock held, or
 3.	on an unshared files_struct.
 
-- 
1.7.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/