linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 53/55] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1315332049-2604-53-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue,  6 Sep 2011 11:00:47 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	patches@...aro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 53/55] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state

Catch SRCU up to the other variants of RCU by making PROVE_RCU
complain if either srcu_read_lock() or srcu_read_lock_held() are
used from within dyntick-idle mode.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/srcu.h |   25 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index 58971e8..fcbaee7 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #define _LINUX_SRCU_H
 
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 
 struct srcu_struct_array {
 	int c[2];
@@ -60,18 +61,10 @@ int __init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp, const char *name,
 	__init_srcu_struct((sp), #sp, &__srcu_key); \
 })
 
-# define srcu_read_acquire(sp) \
-		lock_acquire(&(sp)->dep_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
-# define srcu_read_release(sp) \
-		lock_release(&(sp)->dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
-
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
 int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
 
-# define srcu_read_acquire(sp)  do { } while (0)
-# define srcu_read_release(sp)  do { } while (0)
-
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
 void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
@@ -90,11 +83,23 @@ long srcu_batches_completed(struct srcu_struct *sp);
  * read-side critical section.  In absence of CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC,
  * this assumes we are in an SRCU read-side critical section unless it can
  * prove otherwise.
+ *
+ * Note that if the CPU is in an extended quiescent state, for example,
+ * if the CPU is in dyntick-idle mode, then rcu_read_lock_held() returns
+ * false even if the CPU did an rcu_read_lock().  The reason for this is
+ * that RCU ignores CPUs that are in extended quiescent states, so such
+ * a CPU is effectively never in an RCU read-side critical section
+ * regardless of what RCU primitives it invokes.  This state of affairs
+ * is required -- RCU would otherwise need to periodically wake up
+ * dyntick-idle CPUs, which would defeat the whole purpose of dyntick-idle
+ * mode.
  */
 static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(struct srcu_struct *sp)
 {
 	if (debug_locks)
 		return lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map);
+	if (rcu_check_extended_qs())
+		return 0;
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -150,7 +155,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *sp) __acquires(sp)
 {
 	int retval = __srcu_read_lock(sp);
 
-	srcu_read_acquire(sp);
+	rcu_lock_acquire(&(sp)->dep_map);
 	return retval;
 }
 
@@ -164,7 +169,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *sp) __acquires(sp)
 static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *sp, int idx)
 	__releases(sp)
 {
-	srcu_read_release(sp);
+	rcu_lock_release(&(sp)->dep_map);
 	__srcu_read_unlock(sp, idx);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/