linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:42:35 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
Cc:	"Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@...yusa.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:53:31PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 08/26/11 16:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:58:49PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 08/13/11 03:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Whee, I can skip release announcements too!
> >>>
> >>> So no the subject ain't no mistake its not, 3.0.1-rt11 is there for the
> >>> grabs.
> 
> < snip >
> 
> >> I have a consistent (every boot) hang on boot.  With a few
> >> hacks to get console output, I get the
> >>
> >>   rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
> 
> < snip >
> 
> >> This is an ARM NaviEngine (out of tree, so I also have applied
> >> a series of pages for platform support).
> >>
> >> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is set.  Full config is attached.
> 
> I have also replicated the problem on the ARM RealView (in tree) and
> without the RT patches.
> 
> > 
> > Hmmm...  The last few that I have seen that looked like this were
> > due to my messing up rcutorture so that the RCU-boost testing kthreads
> > ran CPU-bound at real-time priority.
> > 
> > Is it possible that something similar is happening on your system?
> > 
> >                                                         Thanx, Paul
> 
> The problem ended up being caused by the allowed cpus mask being set
> to all possible cpus for the ksoftirqd on the secondary processors.
> So the RCU softirq was never executing on cpu 2.

That would be bad!  ;-)

Thank you for tracking this down!

							Thanx, Paul

> I'll test the following patch on 3.1 tomorrow.
> 
> -Frank Rowand
> 
> 
> Symptom: rcu stall
> 
> The problem was that ksoftirqd was woken on the secondary processors before
> the secondary processors were online.  This led to allowed cpus being set
> to all cpus.
> 
>    wake_up_process()
>       try_to_wake_up()
>          select_task_rq()
>             if (... || !cpu_online(cpu))
>                select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p)
>                   ...
>                   /* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
>                   dest_cpu = cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(p)
>                      do_set_cpus_allowed(p, cpu_possible_mask)
>                         #  Thus ksoftirqd can now run on any cpu...
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
> ---
>  kernel/softirq.c |   19 	14 +	5 -	0 !
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/kernel/softirq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_stat);
>  static struct softirq_action softirq_vec[NR_SOFTIRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> 
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd_pending_online);
> 
>  char *softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {
>  	"HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "BLOCK_IOPOLL",
> @@ -862,28 +863,36 @@ static int __cpuinit cpu_callback(struct
>  			return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(p));
>  		}
>  		kthread_bind(p, hotcpu);
> -  		per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) = p;
> +		per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = p;
>   		break;
>  	case CPU_ONLINE:
>  	case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> +		per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) =
> +			per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> +		per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = NULL;
>  		wake_up_process(per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu));
>  		break;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>  	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
>  	case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
> -		if (!per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu))
> +		p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> +		if (!p)
> +			p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> +		if (!p)
>  			break;
>  		/* Unbind so it can run.  Fall thru. */
> -		kthread_bind(per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu),
> -			     cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask));
> +		kthread_bind(p, cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask));
>  	case CPU_DEAD:
>  	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN: {
>  		static const struct sched_param param = {
>  			.sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1
>  		};
> 
> -		p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> +		p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> +		if (!p)
> +			p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
>  		per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) = NULL;
> +		per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = NULL;
>  		sched_setscheduler_nocheck(p, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
>  		kthread_stop(p);
>  		takeover_tasklets(hotcpu);
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/