[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E67B7C7.8060800@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:28:23 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] SPI: add ability to say we want a cs change after
every transfer.
On 09/07/11 19:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:14:15PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 09/07/11 18:35, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> We could add this in regmap if required.
>
>> Makes more sense in spi and has been in their 'may be needed comment'
>> from the first. Also, lots of other users who don't fit into regmap
>> (because they don't have any registers to speak of :)
>
> Right, but obviously anything doing SPI transfers can just set the flag
> in the transfers anyway. It looked like you were adding this to the
> core due to other intervening abstractions, probably this is just a
> problem with your changelog.
I'll make it clearer that it has uses there elsewhere as well not to
mention merely stopping stupid bugs in drivers where this is always
needed.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists