linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/18] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110907001742.GE31945@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:17:42 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active
 tasks

On Sun 04-09-11 09:53:20, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> It's a years long problem that a large number of short-lived dirtiers
> (eg. gcc instances in a fast kernel build) may starve long-run dirtiers
> (eg. dd) as well as pushing the dirty pages to the global hard limit.
  I don't think it's years long problem. When we do per-cpu ratelimiting,
short lived processes have the same chance (proportional to the number of
pages dirtied) of hitting balance_dirty_pages() as long-run dirtiers have.
So this problem seems to be introduced by your per task dirty ratelimiting?
But given that you kept per-cpu ratelimiting in the end, is this still an
issue? Do you have some numbers for this patch?

								Honza

> The solution is to charge the pages dirtied by the exited gcc to the
> other random gcc/dd instances. It sounds not perfect, however should
> behave good enough in practice.
> 
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/writeback.h |    2 ++
>  kernel/exit.c             |    2 ++
>  mm/page-writeback.c       |   12 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-next.orig/include/linux/writeback.h	2011-08-29 19:14:22.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/include/linux/writeback.h	2011-08-29 19:14:32.000000000 +0800
> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, dirty_leaks);
> +
>  /*
>   * The 1/4 region under the global dirty thresh is for smooth dirty throttling:
>   *
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-08-29 19:14:22.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-08-29 19:14:32.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1237,6 +1237,7 @@ void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page 
>  }
>  
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bdp_ratelimits);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, dirty_leaks) = 0;
>  
>  /**
>   * balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr - balance dirty memory state
> @@ -1285,6 +1286,17 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
>  			ratelimit = 0;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Pick up the dirtied pages by the exited tasks. This avoids lots of
> +	 * short-lived tasks (eg. gcc invocations in a kernel build) escaping
> +	 * the dirty throttling and livelock other long-run dirtiers.
> +	 */
> +	p = &__get_cpu_var(dirty_leaks);
> +	if (*p > 0 && current->nr_dirtied < ratelimit) {
> +		nr_pages_dirtied = min(*p, ratelimit - current->nr_dirtied);
> +		*p -= nr_pages_dirtied;
> +		current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
> +	}
>  	preempt_enable();
>  
>  	if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
> --- linux-next.orig/kernel/exit.c	2011-08-26 16:19:27.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/kernel/exit.c	2011-08-29 19:14:22.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1044,6 +1044,8 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
>  	validate_creds_for_do_exit(tsk);
>  
>  	preempt_disable();
> +	if (tsk->nr_dirtied)
> +		__this_cpu_add(dirty_leaks, tsk->nr_dirtied);
>  	exit_rcu();
>  	/* causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(). */
>  	tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/