[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E67E10A.3020809@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:24:26 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com
CC: konrad.wilk@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM
On 09/06/2011 09:41 AM, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
>
> PV spinlocks cannot possibly work with the current code because they are
> enabled after pvops patching has already been done, and because PV
> spinlocks use a different data structure than native spinlocks so we
> cannot switch between them dynamically. A spinlock that has been taken
> once by the native code (__ticket_spin_lock) cannot be taken by
> __xen_spin_lock even after it has been released.
>
> Reported-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> index e79dbb9..51339b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,6 @@ static void __init xen_hvm_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> WARN_ON(xen_smp_intr_init(0));
>
> xen_init_lock_cpu(0);
> - xen_init_spinlocks();
> }
Should I add this back here on the pv ticketlock branch?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists